Pengaruh Heptagon Fraud Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement Pada Perusahaan Basic Materials Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2021-2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53494/jira.v12i1.1361Kata Kunci:
Fraudulent Financial Statement, Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Capability, Arrogance, Culture, ReligiosityAbstrak
Statements. The population of this study is companies in the Basic Materials sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2021-2024 period. The study population was 109 companies with 41 of them being a sample that met the criteria. The technique used is purposive sampling. The data analysis technique used was multiple linear regression processed using SPSS 25. The results of this study show that Pressure, Rationalization has no effect on Fraudulent Financial Statements. Opportunity, Capability, Arrogance have a positive or insignificant effect on Fraudulent Financial Statements. Meanwhile, Culture has a negative and significant effect on Fraudulent Financial Statements and Religiosity has a positive and significant effect on Fraudulent Financial Statements. And simultaneous testing proves that Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Capability, Arrogance, Culture, and Religiosity have a significant effect on Fraudulent Financial Statements. In the Coefficient of Determination Test, the results obtained that the variables Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Capability, Arrogance, Culture, and Religiosity were able to explain 8.9% of the variation in Fraudulent Financial Statements. Meanwhile, the remaining 91.1% were influenced by other variables outside the research model.
Referensi
Aba, T., Koomson, A., Matthew, G., Owusu, Y., Bekoe, R. A., & Oquaye, M. (2020). Determinants Of Asset Misappropriation At The Workplace : The Moderating Role Of Perceived Strength Of Internal Controls Strength. Journal Of Financial Crime Department Ofaccounting, Business School, University Ofghana, Accra, Ghana, And. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/JFC-04-2020-0067
ACFE. (2025). Bersama, Mengurangi Penipuan Di Seluruh Dunia. In Association Of Certified Fraud Examiners. Https://Www.Acfe.Com/Fraud-Resources/Fraud-101-What-Is-Fraud
Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Dapit Pamungkas, I. (2022). Hexagon Fraud : Detection Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting In. Economies Article, 1–16. Https://Doi.Org/Doi.Org/10.3390/ Economies10010013
Afrizal, R. (2024). Pengaruh Fraud Heptagon Terhadap Timbulnya Fraudulent Financial Statement Dengan Earnings Management Sebagai Variable Intervening. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
Alifa, R. (2022). Analisis Teori Hexagon Fraud Sebagai Pendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 11(6), 1–25.
Association Of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report To The Nations.
Association Of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia. (2025). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2025.
Bilkis, M. S., & Reskino, R. (2022). Apakah Good Corporate Governance Memoderasi Hubungan Kecenderungan Kecurangan Manajemen Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement? Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 6(2), 2579–9975. Http://Jurnal.Ugj.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jka
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes And Consequences Of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis Of Firms Subject To Enforcement Actions By The SEC. Contemporary Accounting Reseach, 13(1), 136. Https://Doi.Org//Doi.Org/10.1111/J.1911-3846.1996.Tb00489.Xdigital Object Identifier (DOI)
Elisabeth, D. M., & Simanjuntak, W. (2020). Analisis Review Pendeteksian Kecurangan (Fraud). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Methodist, 4(1), 9–18. Https://Doi.Org/10.46880/Jsika.Vol4No1.Pp9-18
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory Of The Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs And Ownership Structure Theory Of The Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs And Ownership Structure. Journal Of Financial Economics, 4(4), 1–77.
Larum, K., Zuhroh, D., & Subiyantoro, E. (2021). Fraudlent Financial Reporting: Menguji Potensi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Dengan Menggunakan Teori Fraud Hexagon. AFRE (Accounting And Financial Review), 4(1), 82–94. Https://Doi.Org/10.26905/Afr.V4i1.5818
Majidah, & Aryanty, N. (2022). Determinants Of Financial Shenanigans Indications During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Akuntansi, XXVI(03), 391–408.
Mita, N. K., & Arie, S. A. P. (2024). Pengaruh Kompetensi Aparatur, Budaya Organisasi, Dan Moralitas Individu Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa: Studi Empiris Pada Desa Di Kecamatan Bangsal. Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 6, 3384–3398. Https://Doi.Org/10.47467/Alkharaj.V6i3.5283
Nacoulma, L., Akouwerabou, L., & Nassè, T. B. (2020). The Growing Issue Of Bussines Fraud In Burkina Faso : What Best Prevetion Device ? International Journal Of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 2(7), 437–457.
Nurbaiti, A., & Putri, A. A. (2023). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1), 215–228.
Pamungkas, I. D., & Irwandi, S. A. (2024). Detecting Fraudulent Þ Nancial Reporting : Heptagon Fraud Model. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 14(2), 153–174. Https://Doi.Org/10.14414/Tiar.V14i2.4523
POJK No. 57/POJK.04/2017. (2017). Penerapan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Efek Yang Melakukan Kegiatan Usaha Sebagai Penjamin Emisi Efek Dan Perantara Perdagangan Efek. In Ojk.Go.Id (Vol. 1, Issue 3). Https://Ojk.Go.Id/Id/Regulasi/Pages/Penerapan-Tata-Kelola-Perusahaan-Efek-Yang-Melakukan-Kegiatan-Usaha-Sebagai-Penjamin-Emisi-Efek-Dan-Perantara-Pedagang-Efek.Aspx
Reskino, & Azizah, S. (2023). Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Statement : Pengujian Fraud Heptagon Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Governance, 4(2022), 17–37.
Rizkiawan, M., & Subagio, S. (2023). Fraud Hexagon And Corporate Governance Analysis On The Potential Fraud In Financial Statements. In Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi (Vol. 8, Issue 2).
Rosari, R., Zacharias, J., & Pono, R. (2021). Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Pelaporan Keuangan : Pendekatan Faktor Individu Pendahuluan. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 24(2), 251–276.
Sholikatun, R. (2021). Determinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan ( Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory ). Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 158, 328–350. Https://Doi.Org/10.24034/J25485024.Y2023.V7.I3.5484
Syakirun Ni’am, & Ramadhan, A. (2024). Auditor BPKP Ungkap Kejanggalan Laporan Keuangan PT Timah 2019: Pendapatan Tertinggi, Kerugian Terbesar. KOMPAS.Com. Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/Read/2024/11/14/18202291/Auditor-Bpkp-Ungkap-Kejanggalan-Laporan-Keuangan-Pt-Timah-2019-Pendapatan?Utm_Source=Various&Utm_Medium=Referral&Utm_Campaign=AIML_Widget_Desktop
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory Of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model. Journal Of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. Https://Www.Researchgate.Net/Profile/Georgios-Vousinas/Publication/329389819_Advancing_Theory_Of_Fraud_The_SCORE_Model/Links/5c7eb781458515831f879103/Advancing-Theory-Of-Fraud-The-SCORE-Model.Pdf
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Raulina Br. Sitinjak, Duma Megaria Elisabeth, Ivo Maelina Silitonga
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JURNAL ILMIAH RAFLESIA AKUNTANSI (JIRA) is licensed under a 