Perception of the Non-English Department Students toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence in English Language Writing Activities

Penulis

  • Desti Ariani Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup
  • Riza Eka Putri STKIP Widyaswara Indonesia
  • Ade Dwi Jayanti Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53494/jpvr.v6i1.1380

Kata Kunci:

Artificial Intelligence, Students’ Perception, Writing Activities

Abstrak

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially generative AI applications such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, Google Tanslate, or Quillbot, has significantly influenced every aspect of educational practices. In English language learning class, especially for Non-English Department students, Artificial Intelligence has widespread used to help the students deal with their English inadequacy competence whether speaking, reading, and even writing. This study aims to investigate Non-English Department students’ perception toward the use of AI in writing activities. The research focuses on how students view the benefits and challenges related to AI enhanced writing. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed through questionnaires and interviews involving 28 students. The findings indicate that most students perceive AI positively because it helps in expanding vocabulary, enhancing grammar, generating ideas, and improving writing efficiency. However, students also raise concerns regarding the challenges related to lack of competence, limited access, inaccuracy information, and plagiarism issue in using AI. The study concludes that AI can be a supportive tool in writing activities if used responsibly and ethically under proper academic guidance

Referensi

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery. (610–623).

Dawson. (2024). Defending assessment security in a digital world: Preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education. Routledge.

Eaton, S.E. (2023). Plagiarism in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02.

Jelson, A., Manesh, D., Jang, A., Dunlap, D., & Lee, S. W. (2025). An empirical study to understand how students use ChatGPT for writing essays. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10551.

Jaya, S., & Susyla, D. (2024). Assessing students’ perceptions of AI grammar and writing assistance tools: Implications for Academic Writing Instruction. Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal. 4 (3), 182-190.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences Elsevier, 103, 102274.

Kohnke, T., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727.

Mollick, E. (2023). Using AI to support learning and writing: Opportunities and implications. Harvard Business School Working Paper.

Selwyn, N. (2022). Digital education in the age of automation: AI and the future of learning. Routledge.

Selwyn, Neil. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic.

Tlili, N. Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments Springer. 10(1).

Utami, S., & Ariati, J. (2025). Leveraging AI for collaborative writing: A Mixed Method Study on Student Experiences using AI Writing Tools. BRIGHT Journal of English Language Teaching. 8 (1), 105-115.

Wang, L., Xu, S., & Liu, K. (2024). Understanding students’ acceptance of ChatGPT as a translation tool: A UTAUT model analysis. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06254.

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

Yan, D., & Zhang, S. (2024). L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A multiple case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, (1086).

Yang, Y., Wang, L., & Li, H. (2024). Students’ use of machine translation tools in second language writing: Bridging linguistic gaps and reducing writing anxiety. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12567-3.

Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(482).

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

26-05-2026

Cara Mengutip

Ariani, D., Eka Putri, R., & Dwi Jayanti, A. (2026). Perception of the Non-English Department Students toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence in English Language Writing Activities . Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Raflesia, 6(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.53494/jpvr.v6i1.1380